What Do We Actually Agree We Need?
Black political and civic power is often discussed in terms of elections, individual candidates, representation, or the crisis of the moment. Less attention is given to a more foundational question: What are the priorities around which substantial portions of Black communities can…
What is happening.
Black political and civic power is often discussed in terms of elections, individual candidates, representation, or the crisis of the moment. Less attention is given to a more foundational question: What are the priorities around which substantial portions of Black communities can actually agree?
Political and institutional influence requires more than participation. It also requires clarity. A community has greater bargaining power when institutions understand that there are identifiable needs, measurable expectations, and consequences for repeatedly failing to address them.
That does not require Black people to agree on everything. No community does. Differences in geography, class, age, gender, ideology, religion, profession, and lived experience will continue to produce legitimate disagreement.
But disagreement on some questions does not mean consensus is impossible on all questions.
There may be broad areas of agreement around educational opportunity, maternal health, housing stability, neighborhood investment, economic mobility, protection of civil rights, public safety, environmental conditions, childcare, elder care, entrepreneurship, healthcare, and other matters that directly shape Black life.
The purpose of this Action is not to endorse a political party, candidate, or ideology. It is to develop a community-defined civic agenda that makes shared priorities more visible and gives people a clearer framework for evaluating whether institutions are responding to them.
The question is simple: If we had to identify the needs we expect institutions to take seriously, what would they be?
What members can do.
Begin a structured Lana’s House civic-priorities process. Members propose issues rather than candidates or political parties. Similar submissions are organized into major themes. The community then discusses competing priorities, identifies areas of meaningful agreement and disagreement, and progressively narrows the list. The goal is to develop approximately five to seven clearly defined priorities, each accompanied by the problem being addressed, the outcome being sought, the institutions capable of affecting it, and measurable indicators that can be used to evaluate progress.
View Meeting Details